Critique

I recently confronted two questions pertaining to my previous post named "cerebration".
I am posting the questions along with my responses here, simply because the critics were convinced, and understood things from my standpoint which I do not experience often.

1. What about God? What are your thoughts about God?

A. As far as the concept of god propagated by the labyrinth of the organised religious systems is concerned, I am an atheist.
My concept of God is any tangible or intangible force that gives me the feeling of being able to look up to it as a recourse, as a guide, as a friend....and as myriads of other effable and ineffable entities. He/She/It might be myself, another person, an event, an idea :all playing the requisite role at various points in time and space.
(From my experience, you can't convince people from the opposite camp if you put it in a plain fuckin extremist capsule:D(unless you have a chrome plated sixer in hand) but this got her thinking atleast)


2. How can thought be evolution free…? Then it would be stagnant wouldn’t it???
It makes you think this piece you have written … but is it a part of something bigger .. it kind of feels incomplete…

A. Thought may be stagnant and still not bound. For example, we have evolved to be able to think out of the species, to be able to lose the herd instinct. Whether we do it or not is again our choice. Our thought may be stagnant as we may not be able to imagine what future beholds, but still we are free to think in our capacity. What I wanted to lay emphasis upon is that somehow even this freedom to think with our full capacity is being curbed by the factors that I mentioned; and this hurts.